<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hi-tech blog &#187; performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Windows 7 promises better performance with NAND SSDs</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-7-promises-better-performance-with-nand-ssds/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-7-promises-better-performance-with-nand-ssds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[try]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-7-promises-better-performance-with-nand-ssds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s plans for improving performance of SSD drives in Windows 7 are starting to emerge concrete with some solutions.
&#60;br&#62;&#60;br&#62;
Manufacturers like Seagate or Sandisk are working to finish their cut of the work as much as possible, and Microsoft is trying to make the Windows 7 fit as best as it can to the new storage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-7-promises-better-performance-with-nand-ssds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Search 4.0 Desktop Performance tips and considerations</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-search-40-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-search-40-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-search-40-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Hester: Doing a lot of work with Windows Search I have learned how the tool works and I have worked with a lot of great folks at corporate to help put together some fantastic information on performance tips and considerations.  Also in this post I wanted to talk about some of the key [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/22/windows-search-40-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Announces General Availability of Windows Small Business Server 2008 and Windows Essential Business Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/microsoft-announces-general-availability-of-windows-small-business-server-2008-and-windows-essential-business-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/microsoft-announces-general-availability-of-windows-small-business-server-2008-and-windows-essential-business-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/microsoft-announces-general-availability-of-windows-small-business-server-2008-and-windows-essential-business-server-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of Microsoft Corp.’s $6.5 billion annual investment in products, support programs and incentives for small and midsize businesses, the company today announced the general availability of Windows Small Business Server 2008 (SBS 2008) and Windows Essential Business Server 2008 (EBS 2008). These solutions bring the power of Microsoft’s enterprise-class server technologies to small [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/microsoft-announces-general-availability-of-windows-small-business-server-2008-and-windows-essential-business-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Windows 7 skewering justified?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/was-windows-7-skewering-justified/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/was-windows-7-skewering-justified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[while]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/was-windows-7-skewering-justified/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[InfoWorld&#8217;s benchmark report on Windows 7 has made waves this week with its conclusion that the early build of&#160;Microsoft&#8217;s next&#160;operating system is essentially Windows Vista &#8212; but worse. 
&#8220;So far, Windows 7 looks and behaves almost exactly like Windows Vista. It performs almost exactly like Vista. And it breaks all sorts of things that used [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/14/was-windows-7-skewering-justified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big Windows 7 lie</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/13/the-big-windows-7-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/13/the-big-windows-7-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/13/the-big-windows-7-lie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols: You&#8217;ve read the early reviews with comments like Windows 7 is a big improvement over Vista and Windows 7 is wicked fast. Sounds great doesn&#8217;t it? On closer inspection though Windows 7 M3 (Milestone 3) is being revealed as being just a &#34;slightly tweaked version of Vista.&#34;
&#60;br&#62;&#60;br&#62;
When I said recently that early [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/13/the-big-windows-7-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Suggestion for removing PC evidences ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/11/any-suggestion-for-removing-pc-evidences/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/11/any-suggestion-for-removing-pc-evidences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/11/any-suggestion-for-removing-pc-evidences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Everyone
I m luking for a solution that will clean my all evidences which i left on my PC &#38; improve it&#8217;s performance
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/11/any-suggestion-for-removing-pc-evidences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should i use Vista with this pc?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My computer
P4 3Ghz (not dual core)
1.5Gb ram
120GB Hdd
256 Mb Gforce 6200 (what do u think about vista performance?)
my all friends using vista but i m using now original win xp pro with sp3. i want to buy vista business(for my workstation)
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should i use Vista with this pc?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My computer
P4 3Ghz (not dual core)
1.5Gb ram
120GB Hdd
256 Mb Gforce 6200 (what do u think about vista performance?)
my all friends using vista but i m using now original win xp pro with sp3. i want to buy vista business(for my workstation)
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/10/should-i-use-vista-with-this-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does this work??</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys!
I&#8217;ve finally chosen my computers specs, could you tell me if they will work or not?
Motherboard:
Asus M2N68-AM
CPU:
AMD Athlon X2 5200+
RAM:
2G Kit-667 Kingston(2x 1Gigabyte sticks)
Hard Drive:
Samsung SATA 160Gigabyte
Graphics Card:
512M 9600GT Generic
Disc Drive:
Cheapest DVD-RAM Drive(To read every type of disc)
PSU w/ Case:
R.D. Performance-600
Also will a DVD-RAM Drive read everything, thanks
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does this work??</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys!
I&#8217;ve finally chosen my computers specs, could you tell me if they will work or not?
Motherboard:
Asus M2N68-AM
CPU:
AMD Athlon X2 5200+
RAM:
2G Kit-667 Kingston(2x 1Gigabyte sticks)
Hard Drive:
Samsung SATA 160Gigabyte
Graphics Card:
512M 9600GT Generic
Disc Drive:
Cheapest DVD-RAM Drive(To read every type of disc)
PSU w/ Case:
R.D. Performance-600
Also will a DVD-RAM Drive read everything, thanks
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/08/does-this-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>virus: iexplore.exe as system process</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/06/virus-iexploreexe-as-system-process/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/06/virus-iexploreexe-as-system-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/06/virus-iexploreexe-as-system-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t seem to close iexplore.exe even when there is no windows explorer opened. Ads always pop up from time to time. I also hear ad voices/noises in the background. It&#8217;s annoying and I feel as the system performance had slowed down. Please help. This is my HiJackThis log:
Logfile of HijackThis v1.99.1
Scan saved at 4:15:28 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/06/virus-iexploreexe-as-system-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successor to SQL 2008 is codenamed &quot;Kilimanjaro&quot;</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/04/successor-to-sql-2008-is-codenamed-kilimanjaro/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/04/successor-to-sql-2008-is-codenamed-kilimanjaro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[something]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/04/successor-to-sql-2008-is-codenamed-kilimanjaro/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad Anderson, general manager of the Management and Services division at Microsoft, announced the successor to SQL 2008; codenamed SQL Server &#34;Kilimanjaro&#34; and SQL Self Service Analysis codenamed &#34;Gemini&#34; today at the Teched EMEA 2008 IT Pro keynote.
&#60;br&#62;&#60;br&#62;
Christian Petculescu, principal architect for the SQL team, was invited to stage. He demo&#8217;d SQL &#34;gemini&#34;, loading million [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/04/successor-to-sql-2008-is-codenamed-kilimanjaro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Core i7 CPU reviews out</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel has today given the OK for the posting of &#34;official&#34; articles showing the performance of the upcoming Core i7 processors. Set to be introduced in two weeks time, together with X58 motherboards, the three Core i7 models prepared by Intel are the 2.66 GHz 920, the 2.93 GHz 940 and 3.2 GHz 965 Extreme [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Core i7 CPU reviews out</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel has today given the OK for the posting of &#34;official&#34; articles showing the performance of the upcoming Core i7 processors. Set to be introduced in two weeks time, together with X58 motherboards, the three Core i7 models prepared by Intel are the 2.66 GHz 920, the 2.93 GHz 940 and 3.2 GHz 965 Extreme [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/03/core-i7-cpu-reviews-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No thermal paste = Safe ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/02/no-thermal-paste-safe-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/02/no-thermal-paste-safe-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/02/no-thermal-paste-safe-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hello there, i&#8217;ve got my new cpu ( Celeron Northwood 2.3GHZ SKT 478) 1 month ago but when i was cleaning my HSF last night i realised my cpu had no thermal paste but there was some kind of old paste on my HSF. I just wanna know if its safe to run a cpu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hi-tech-sw.net/2008/11/02/no-thermal-paste-safe-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
 
